Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Kelter's avatar

Good article, Peter.

There are many nuances to this story. Of course the City Manager was correct in that the Councilmembers could have raised questions between the close of the September 11, 2025 special meeting and September 16, 2025 vote on the budget and millage, except for the fact that everybody in City Hall split for the weekend at the end of the Thursday night special meeting and didn't return to work until nearly noon on Monday. If an elected official speaks out in the middle of another extended government weekend and nobody is working, does it make a sound?

The problem is that Kennedy never had to deal with dissenting opinions on the City Council. It is not uncommon for elected officials to debate policies and budgets. I prefer that they debate. It often leads to better results. Seven years of unanimous votes have left our City's finances in shambles, and has resulted in historically low levels of achievement in infrastructure repair and replacement.

Everybody on the Council agreed over the past 7 years, but not alot was accomplished on a dollar-for-dollar basis as the City Government frittered away reserve accounts that had been painstakingly built over previous years.

Steve Kennedy is a nice man and at one time was probably a decent government employee. But as is often the case with career government employees, if somebody isn't pushing them to greater levels of achievement, they often become complacent, make greater mistakes, and make more excuses for substandard performance.

Expand full comment
Dylan Beck's avatar

I'm not in tune enough with GCS city politics to have an informed opinion, but I highly encourage y'all to label pieces like this as opinion when you put them out. Nothing wrong with opinion pieces, but I don't feel I learned as much as I feel I just read someone's personal blog post. Appreciate CN&V always.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts